Hill Heat

Witnesses

• Dick Wittman, member of the Agricultural Carbon Market Working Group and former president of the Pacific Northwest Direct Seed Association
• Laurie Wayburn, president and co-founder, Pacific Forest Trust
• Ruben Lubowski, economist and the Forest Carbon Economics Fellow, Environmental Defense
• Steve Corneli, vice president market and climate policy, NRG Energy Inc.
• Derik Broekhoff, senior associate, World Resources Institute.

E&E News:

A Senate Agriculture subcommittee enters the brewing debate over allowing industry to use offsets as a low-cost compliance option for new U.S. greenhouse gas regulations with a hearing Wednesday.

With offsets, companies could meet their environmental requirements by funding activities that don’t reduce emissions at their smokestack or tailpipe. Instead, they could rely on soil sequestration, methane capture at a farm or forestry projects.

Senate Forestry and Conservation Subcommittee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) supports the widespread use of offsets as Congress develops cap-and-trade legislation that would put a first-ever limit on U.S. heat-trapping emissions.

In an interview last week, Stabenow called on the sponsors of a pending cap-and-trade bill due on the Senate floor early next month to expand a provision that currently limits use of offsets from both domestic and international projects at 15 percent.

“This whole area of offsets is one they’re moving on,” Stabenow predicted. “I don’t think we should cap it.”

A new version of the bill from Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), John Warner (R-Va.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is expected to be public early this week. But it is unclear whether they will change the offset provisions.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona sees offsets playing a big role in his global warming platform. Last week, McCain said he would let companies meet their initial compliance requirements with an unlimited amount of offsets.

McCain’s campaign cited U.S. EPA and Energy Information Administration studies that show unlimited offsets could lower the climate program’s costs by as much as 71 percent. “Offsets are a very important bridge, especially in the early years, to the time when we have low-carbon technologies available on a commercial wide-scale,” the campaign said.

Addressing a common concern about offsets, the McCain campaign also insisted, “The offset credits will indeed be real, measurable and verifiable – or they won’t be certified and allowed into the market.”

But not everyone sees unlimited offsets in the same light.

“Don’t design a system, a boat, that’s going to leak,” said Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. “If you have 100 percent offsets, as Senator McCain is suggesting, all you have is sending all your money around the world and no investment in the United States. That’s a nonstarter.”

Witnesses

Panel I

• John Stephenson

Panel II

• Dr. George Gray
• Susan Dudley

See related articles.

Witnesses

• Robert A. Malone, Chairman and President, BP America Inc.
• John Hofmeister, President, Shell Oil Company
• Peter J. Robertson, Vice Chairman of the Board, Chevron Corporation
• John E. Lowe, Executive Vice President, ConocoPhillips Company
• J. Stephen Simon, Senior Vice President, Exxon Mobil Corporation

From E&E News:

The success of legislation aimed at cleaning up contaminated sediment in the Great Lakes Basin will receive close scrutiny at a House Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee hearing Wednesday as lawmakers consider its reauthorization.

The Great Lakes Legacy Act of 2002 was designed to eliminate contaminant hot spots where PCBs, heavy metals and other pollutants poured from industrial sources into the Great Lakes and surrounding rivers and tributaries. Thus far, it has contributed to the removal of nearly 800,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment and has received high praise from U.S. EPA officials and lawmakers.

“In Michigan, it has been phenomenally successful,” Rep. Vernon Ehlers (R-Mich.), who authored the legislation, told E&E Daily. “We’ve cleaned up a number of spots.”

Ehlers said he has heard the program was effective in other areas of the Great Lakes as well.

“One person who works in the whole field, including Superfund, said this is the best, most workable pollution cleanup he’s ever worked with,” Ehlers said. “That’s what we want to find out in the hearing. Is that the opinion of one person or is everyone finding it to be a very workable program?”

Ehlers said after the hearing he would work with Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman James Oberstar (D-Minn.) to put a reauthorization bill together.

“We’ll do whatever we can do to improve the program, and we’ll certainly try to get more funding for it because it’s clear it’s working very well and people like it,” he said. “It does what it’s intended to do. If we had more funding we could do a lot more and do it a lot faster.”

Many lawmakers are critical of the Bush administration’s failure to fully fund the legislation. Although the program would receive a $55,000 boost in the administration’s fiscal 2009 budget, the funding still falls $15 million short of the $50 million authorized by Congress.

However, presidential hopefuls Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) all have signed a pledge to fund and support the restoration of the Great Lakes. The price tag for the entire project is expected to exceed $20 billion.

Witnesses

Panel 1

• Robin Nazarro, Director, Natural Resources and Environment Program, U.S. Government Accountability Office
• R. Lyle Laverty, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, U.S. Department of the Interior
• Accompanied by: Ren Lohoefener, Fish and Wildlife Service and Ed Shepard, Bureau of Land Management
• Jane Luxton, General Counsel, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
• Dr. Francesca T. Grifo, Ph.D., Senior Scientist and Director, Scientific Integrity Program, Union of Concerned Scientists

Panel 2

• Scott D. Kraus, Ph.D., Vice President of Research, New England Aquarium
• Dr. Jerry F. Franklin, Ph.D., College of Forest Resources, University of Washington
• Scott Hoffman Black, Executive Director, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation
• David Parsons, Science Fellow, The Rewilding Institute
• Larry Irwin, National Council for Air & Stream Improvement

The Committee on Environment and Public Works will hold a Business Meeting to consider the following items:

• General Services Administration Resolutions.
• Army Corps of Engineers Resolutions.
• S. 2766, the Clean Boating Act of 2008.
• S. 1499, the Marine Vessel Emissions Reduction Act of 2007.
• S. 2555, the Reducing Global Warming Pollution from Vehicles Act of 2008.
• S. 2844, the Beach Protection Act of 2008.
• S. 2707, the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act.
• H.R. 3891, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Establishment Act Amendment of 2008.
• S. 1566, a bill to amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to improve that Act.
• S. 2700, a bill to amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to double the liability limits for single-hull tankers and tank barges for 2009.
• S. 2728, a bill to establish the Twenty-First Century Water Commission to study and develop recommendations for a comprehensive water strategy to address future water needs.
• H.R. 3248, SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2007 (Boxer Substitute Amendment is Attached).
• H.R. 3986, John F. Kennedy Center Reauthorization Act of 2007 (Boxer Substitute Amendment is Attached).
• S. 2403, a bill to designate the new Federal Courthouse, located in the 700 block of East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, as the “Spottswood W. Robinson, III and Robert R. Merhige, Jr. Federal Courthouse.”
• S. 2837, a bill to designate the United States courthouse located at 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, NY as the “Theodore Roosevelt United States Courthouse.”
• S. 3009, a bill to designate the Federal Bureau of Investigation building under construction in Omaha, NE as the “J. James Exon Federal Bureau of Investigation Building.”
• H.R. 1019, a bill to designate the United States customhouse building located at 31 Gonzalez Clemente Ave., in Mayaguez, PR as the “Rafael Martinez Nadal United States Customhouse Building.”
• H.R. 4140, a bill to designate the Port Angeles Federal Building in Port Angeles, Washington as the “Richard B. Anderson Federal Building.”
• H.R. 781, a bill to redesignate Lock and Dam No. 5 of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System near Redfield, Arkansas, as the “Colonel Charles D. Maynard Lock and Dam.”

• Pending nomination:

David R. Hill, of Virginia, to be Assistant Administrator and General Counsel of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

The hearing, originally scheduled for May 8, will examine the new ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and the process the Environmental Protection Agency used in setting them.

On March 12, 2008, EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson finalized updated NAAQS for ozone, a primary component of smog. The new ozone NAAQS are comprised of a revised primary standard to protect health and a revised secondary standard to protect the environment. In setting both standards, EPA Administrator Johnson did not accept the recommendations provided to him by EPA’s independent scientific review committee, the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC). With regard to the secondary standard, Administrator Johnson’s efforts to set a new standard were overruled by the White House.

In light of new information obtained by the Committee, questions are also expected regarding the White House’s role in EPA’s action to block California’s program to regulate greenhouse gases from automobiles.

Witnesses

Panel I

• Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
• Susan E. Dudley, Administrator of OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
• Dr. Rogene Henderson, Chair, Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee

Panel II

• Dr. Francesca Grifo, Senior Scientist, Union Of Concerned Scientists
• Michael Goo, Climate Legislative Director, Natural Resources Defense Council
• Dr. Roger O. McClellan, Advisor, Toxicology and Human Heath Risk Analysis
• Alan Charles Raul, Partner, Sidley Austin, LLP

Witnesses

• Jeffrey H. Harris, Chief Economist, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
• Michael W. Masters, Managing Member and Portfolio Manager, Masters Capital Management, LLC
• Michael D. Walter, President, Commodity Markets Council
• Benn Steil, Ph.D., Senior Fellow and Director of International Economics, Council on Foreign Relations
• Tom Buis, President, National Farmers Union

Witnesses

• Nikolao Pula, Director of the Office of Insular Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior
• Anthony Neil, Executive Director, Pacific Power Association
• Herbert Wade, Consultant, Pacific Renewable Energy
• Utu Abe Malae, President, Development Bank of American Samoa
• Howard Snow, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Installations and Facilities, U.S. Navy

Representatives from CRS, EIA, EPA, and CBO discuss their economic analyses of Lieberman-Warner (S. 2191) and other emissions-controlling climate legislative proposals.

Witnesses

• Brent Yacobucci, Congressional Research Service
• Dr. Larry Parker, Congressional Research Service
• Dr. Howard Gruenspecht, Deputy Administrator, Energy Information Administration
• Dr. Brian McLean, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
• Dr. Peter Orszag, Congressional Budget Office