From the Wonk Room.
Democrats recently elected to the U.S. Senate have pressed their
colleagues to ambitiously address climate and energy reform, and are
frustrated by the lack of action. In a series of interviews with the
Wonk Room at Netroots Nation, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), Sen. Tom Udall
(D-NM), Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), and Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) described
the challenges of confronting climate pollution in the sclerotic
legislative body, brought to a practical standstill by minority
obstruction. They each discussed how the “new class” of 22 Democratic
senators elected in the 2006 and 2008 waves (with independent Bernie
Sanders of Vermont) have pressed for greater “political clarity” on
climate by “rattling all the cages” in the Senate, alongside senior
leaders such as Sen. John Kerry (D-MA).
Questioned by the Wonk Room why Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)
shied away from introducing a comprehensive climate
bill
for full Senate consideration as energy crises pile up during the
hottest summer ever recorded, the senators noted the ability of
Republicans to thwart the will of the majority through the abuse of
parliamentary
procedures.
They recognized Reid’s
decision to try for quick
action with a limited package in what little time is left during this
Congress. However, they relished the chance to debate the promise of a
green economy before the November elections, seeing the issue as a
political winner:
CARDIN: I think we need political
clarity. I wasn’t so concerned about having a vote before August.
But we needed the clarity of the bill.
FRANKEN: If you want to rev up people, and
say Democrats believe in this – one of the gaps they’re talking about
is the enthusiasm gap. So maybe, politically, that is the right way to
go. I think that Harry tends to want to get half a loaf or a third of
a loaf rather than no loaf at all. This bill could be considered a
first step. A lot of that is strategic, in terms of positioning
yourself for the election. I was sort of of the school that we
should go for pricing carbon, and if we lose, we lose. But that’s
not what we did.
UDALL: Our two classes – the class of 2006
and the class of 2008 – I think have a real passion for all of the
things you talked about and a desire to do something. We’re rattling
all the cages in the committees we’re on, doing the things that we
can do. But there is kind of an institutional thing going on there
that slows everything down. There’s no doubt about that.
MERKLEY: This generational factor is why, if
we can create a course that at least puts us on the right track for
the next six to eight years, we will have with each subsequent
election more and more folks coming in—based on what I hear at the
university level, and graduate school level, and based on the
difference between our class and the several classes ahead of us –
there is just a growing commitment and passion to fighting this
fight on climate and energy.
Watch Udall, Merkley, and Franken discuss their efforts to bring new
passion to the climate and energy fight:
The Democrats described by Sen. Cardin as the “new class” overwhelmingly
support strong green economy legislation, unlike the older generation
peppered with climate
peacocks.
In fact, according to Politico, every one of the 12 Democrats elected
in 2008 would vote
for cloture on comprehensive climate and energy reform. Of the ten
Democrats elected in 2006, only Sen. Claire
McCaskill
(D-MO) and Sen. Jim
Webb
(D-VA) make polluter-friendly arguments against clean energy reform.
“This is going to be a generational battle,” Merkley explained. “We’re
going to have keep working and pushing because even our most optimistic
bill has fairly weak goals for 2020. We’re going to have to be a lot
more aggressive between 2020 and 2050 if we’re going to address carbon
dioxide.”
“We can’t give up,” Cardin said during his interview, “because the
stakes are too high for our country.”