Senators John Kerry, Joe Lieberman, and Lindsey
Graham are working with the White House, environmentalists, and industry
to craft comprehensive climate and clean energy
legislation,
which they plan to unveil on Monday. But Sen. Dick Lugar (R-IN) and Sen.
George Voinovich (R-OH), both of whom have admitted the threat of global
warming, today announced “a narrower competing
bill” that
resembles the weak legislation passed out of the Senate energy committee
last year:
George V. Voinovich of Ohio and Richard G. Lugar of Indiana are
developing an energy-only bill that would mandate new renewable and
nuclear power production without imposing cuts on carbon emissions.
Lugar first unveiled this plan on
March 30, which looks like something from the Carter era. This approach,
which has also been floated by energy committee members Sen. Byron
Dorgan (D-ND), Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), and Sen. Lisa Murkowksi
(R-AK), has been described by Graham as
“half-assed.”
Voinovich believes that subsidy-based legislation that fails to reduce
global
warming
pollution is more “doable” than comprehensive reform that pays its own
way by putting a price on carbon pollution:
I’d like to get something done. But I’m not sure it would meet the
standards of the environmental groups or what Sen. Kerry would like to
get done. I’d like to do the doable — move it down the field while I
can.
More problematically, Voinovich also announced today that climate
legislation “must include a comprehensive preemption
provision
that goes well beyond language included in previous climate bills” to
get his support, a poison-pill stance that would derail the progress
made by states across the nation to build a green economy.
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) have been
jockeying for attention with a bill that addresses the other half of
energy reform, a climate-only
package
with weak targets known as the CLEAR Act.
These senators are participating in a complex dance – if President Obama
and the public throw their weight behind real action, then these
senators can take credit when elements of their bills appear in the
Kerry-Graham-Lieberman legislation. However, if momentum stalls under
the weight of polluter lobbying and Beltway indifference to the climate
crisis, they can instead say they offered a “pragmatic” alternative.