Posted by Brad Johnson on 02/06/2008 at 11:10AM
Former Vice President Al Gore’s statement on the Lieberman-Warner
Climate Security Act (S. 3036):
I want to commend Senator Boxer for her leadership of the Environment
and Public Works Committee. Thanks to her vision and dedication, we
have the first global warming bill in history that is comprehensive,
bipartisan and that enjoys support across the country – from labor and
agriculture to the business and the environmental communities. Of
course the bill needs to be stronger, but it’s vital that Congress
begin to act. While it’s important that people change their light
bulbs, it’s even more important that we change the laws.
Posted by Brad Johnson on 02/06/2008 at 10:47AM
On Saturday, May 31st, Senator Boxer gave the Democratic Radio
Address on this week’s
upcoming debate on the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3036).
Right now, many of our states, including my home state, are leading.
They have the will. Our mayors are leading. They have the will.
Religious leaders have urged us to act now as well. They reminded me
of a wonderful quote that motivates me to work as hard as I can for as
long as it takes to responsibly address global warming. These words
stay with me: “When God created the first man, he took him around to
all the trees in the Garden of Eden and said to him ‘see my handiwork,
how beautiful and choice they are. Be careful not to ruin and destroy
my world, for if you do ruin it, there is no one to repair it after
you.’”
The full text of the address is below.
Posted by Brad Johnson on 29/05/2008 at 09:40AM
The conservative Club for Growth has launched a $250,000 radio and
television
campaign
targeting several coal-state senators in opposition to the
Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 2191/3036). The Environmental
Defense Action Fund, the C(4) side of the Environmental Defense Fund,
has also begun a much larger $4 million campaign that comes on top of
the estimated $8.5 million already spent this year in support of the
cap-and-trade legislation.
The text of the Club for Growth ad running in Tennessee:
Congress is at it again. This time they’re pushing massive new taxes
and regulation in the name of global warming. But let’s ask ourselves,
are the unproven benefits of legislation worth the major job losses,
new taxes and increased energy costs that could result?
Call Senator Lamar Alexander and tell him to vote “no” on the
Lieberman-Warner climate bill. Tennesseans just can’t afford another
huge, costly government program.
Posted by Brad Johnson on 23/05/2008 at 09:09AM
On Wednesday, Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) announced her
support
for S. 3036, saying it “mirrors closely” the Kerry-Snowe Global
Reduction Act (S.
485), which
calls for a 65 percent reduction from 2000 levels of greenhouse gases by
2050. Snowe also noted that language from the Feinstein-Snowe Emission
Allowance Market Transparency Act (S.
2423) was
included in the manager’s mark.
Unlike Lieberman-Warner, Kerry-Snowe also sets a goal of achieving a
greenhouse gas stabilization target of 450 ppm, and calls for the
establishment of vehicle emissions standards. In Snowe’s press release,
she states that Lieberman-Warner “would reduce greenhouse gas emissions
by at least 66 percent by 2050,” although
NRDC analysis of the
bill
finds that Lieberman-Warner would only achieve reductions between 60 to
65 percent from 2000 levels.
Posted by Brad Johnson on 23/05/2008 at 08:07AM
On Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced Sen.
Barbara Boxer’s (D-Calif.) manager’s
mark
of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 2191) as a new bill,
numbered S.
3036. S. 3036
will be the vehicle for the floor debate of the cap-and-trade
legislation. On Thursday, Reid filed for cloture on a motion to proceed
onto the bill, setting the stage for a 5:30 p.m. vote on June 2, one
week from Monday. According to E&E
News, “Few expect the
vote to be contentious.”
“It may even end up being 99-0,” said Andrew Wheeler, staff director
for Senate Environment and Public Works Committee ranking member James
Inhofe (R-Okla.). Inhofe plans to back this procedural step as a
gateway to a bigger debate over the merits of the legislation, Wheeler
said.
Reid, Boxer, and the bill’s co-sponsors, Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and
John Warner (R-Va.), have not determined what terms they will seek for
the debate and amendment process. Reid has the option of exerting
privilege to block unwanted amendments by “filling the tree” with his
own.
Posted by Brad Johnson on 21/05/2008 at 04:27PM
Download the Full document. Titles are
after the break.
Representatives from CRS, EIA,
EPA, and CBO discuss
their economic analyses of Lieberman-Warner (S. 2191) and other
emissions-controlling climate legislative proposals.
Witnesses
- Brent Yacobucci, Congressional Research Service
- Dr. Larry Parker, Congressional Research Service
- Dr. Howard Gruenspecht, Deputy Administrator, Energy Information
Administration
- Dr. Brian McLean, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Dr. Peter Orszag, Congressional Budget Office
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
366 Dirksen
20/05/2008 at 10:00AM
Posted by Brad Johnson on 19/05/2008 at 02:02PM
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) has released an overview of the “global
warming substitute amendment” to the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security
Act (S. 2191) that will be the subject of debate during the first week
of June.
Changes from the version of Lieberman-Warner that was passed out of the
Committee on Environment and Public Works last year include:
- Title V, Subtitle C: Emergency Off-Ramps. “If the price of carbon
allowances reaches a certain price range, there is a mechanism that
will automatically release additional emission allowances onto the
market to lower the price. The additional allowances are borrowed so
that the environmental integrity of the caps over the long term is
protected.”
- Title V, Subtitle I: Financial Relief for Consumers. “The bill sets
aside a nearly $800 billion tax relief fund through 2050, which will
help consumers in need of assistance related to energy costs. The
precise details of the relief will be developed by the Finance
committee.”
- Title XIV: Deficit Neutrality. “This section
auctions allowances and transfers the proceeds to the Treasury to
ensure that the bill is deficit-neutral.”
Full document.
Posted by Brad Johnson on 25/04/2008 at 09:38AM
Darren Samuelson of E&E News reports that Sen. George Voinovich
(R-Ohio), with assistance from the White House, is working on a
legislative alternative to the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S.
2191). The version of the plan that E&E News acquired included:
- Voluntary goals of 2006-level emissions by 2020 and 1990 levels by
2030
- Tax incentives for advanced coal and nuclear power
- A “backstop” cap-and-trade program
The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report outlined the
need for industrialized nations to achieve reductions of 25-40% below
1990 levels by 2020, targets the Annex I Kyoto signatories recognized
in Bali.
From E&E News:
On the other side of the climate debate, Sen. George Voinovich
(R-Ohio) is taking the lead in writing his own climate change bill
that could come up as an alternative to the Lieberman-Warner measure.
Sources on and off Capitol Hill started circulating details of
Voinovich’s proposal last week. An executive summary of the Voinovich
plan obtained yesterday by E&E Daily shows a plan heavy on tax
incentives for new energy technologies such as “clean coal” and
nuclear power, with a cap-and-trade program used as a backstop if the
low- and zero-carbon energy sources do not meet certain milestones.
The summary said those milestones would be to reduce U.S. emissions to
2006 levels by 2020 and 1990 levels by 2030. Voinovich spokesman Chris
Paulitz said yesterday that the summary was “well outdated,” though he
did confirm the senator was working on alternatives.
“He’s trying to figure out a way to make the environment cleaner that
doesn’t kill our economy,” Paulitz said. “Right now, there’s not a
bill in the Senate that does those two things.”
Voinovich is getting help from the Bush administration on his climate
proposal, as well as others. “We’re working with everybody who we can
humanly think of,” Paulitz said. Of the White House, he added, “It’d
be silly to exclude a branch of government that would play a key
role.”