Hill Heat

Witnesses:

Panel 1:

• Zbigniew Brzezinski, Counselor and Trustee, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

Panel 2:

• Dr. Leon Fuerth, Research Professor, The Elliot School of International Affairs, George Washington University
• Zeyno Baran, Director, Center for Eurasian Policy, Hudson Institute
• Roman Kupchinsky, Partner, AZEast Group

Witnesses

Panel 1

• Alexander Karsner, Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
• Dr. Joseph Glauber , Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture
• Dr. Joe Outlaw, Co-Director of the Agricultural and Food Policy Center, Texas A&M University
• Dr. Joachim von Braun, Director General, International Food Policy Research Institute
• Dr. Jason Pyle, Chief Executive Office, Sapphire Energy
• Jack Huttner, Vice President of Biorefinery Business Development, Genencor

Witnesses: Panel 1

• Bob Morton, Senator, State of Washington
• Bob Johnson, Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation
• Dr. Howard Gruenspecht, Deputy Administrator, Energy Information Administration
• Melinda Eden, Oregon Council Member, NW Power and Conservation Council
• Glenn English, Chief Executive Officer, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

Panel 2

• Scott Corwin, Executive Director, Public Power Council
• Richard Roos-Collins, Director of Legal Services, Natural Heritage Institute (Mr. Roos-Collins also serves as Chairman of the Governing Board for the Low Impact Hydropower Institute, and General Counsel for the Hydropower Reform Coalition.)
• Bruce Howard, Director for Environmental Affairs, Avista Utilities
• Tim Culbertson, General Manager, Grant County Public Utility District

From E&E News:

Appropriations bills are usually on the House floor by June, but they are even further behind schedule this year. It has been years since lawmakers passed most appropriations bills individually. Last year, lawmakers lumped all the domestic spending bills together in one omnibus appropriations measure. Two years ago, they funded federal agencies through a continuing resolution. A CR provides funding for existing federal programs, usually at current or reduced levels.

If Congress opts for a CR this year, it could cause some grief for agencies that sought to boost certain funds. For example, the Bush administration made the largest budget request to date for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for 2009, asking for $4.1 billion, a 5 percent increase over last year. NOAA is part of the Commerce, Justice, Science spending package.

“Unfortunately, if we get a CR in ‘09, it is not going to help agencies, especially NOAA,” said Eric Webster, director of NOAA legislative affairs, during a gathering of oceans advocates on Capitol Hill last week.

The White House budget request would give a boost to fisheries programs, environmental satellites and the National Weather Service.

The program for new weather satellites could be particularly problematic under a CR, since the agency has a schedule to ramp up funding from $250 million up to $860 million over the next three years to pay for new satellites.

“We’re going to go through a little bit of a tough time, the budget must grow significantly to pay for satellites,” Webster said.

The $4.1 billion budget request from NOAA would be a significant boost over the $3.9 billion Congress approved last year. But the sum still falls short of the $4.5 billion that environmental and industry groups have sought for the agency.

• Jerome Ensminger, Master Sergeant, U.S. Marine Corps (ret).
• Sheila Holt-Orsted
• Dr. Linda Greer, Director, Health Program, Natural Resources Defense Council
• Lenny Siegel, Executive Director, The Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO)

The Subcommittee will examine the underground injection of carbon dioxide as a method for increasing production from domestic oil and gas fields while decreasing the amount of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere.

Witnesses:

Panel 1

• Timothy Spisak, Chief, Fluid Minerals Division, Bureau of Land Management
• Scott Klara, Director, Strategic Center for Coal, National Energy Technology Laboratory

Panel 2

• Tracy Evans, Senior Vice President of Reservoir Engineering, Denbury Resources, Incorporated
• William Roby, Vice President, Worldwide Engineering and Technical Services, Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation
• Dr. Greg Kunkel, Vice President, Environmental Affairs, Tenaska, Incorporated
• Dr. Ian Duncan, Associate Director, Earth and Environmental Systems, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin
• Mark Demchuk, Team Lead, Weyburn, EnCana Oil and Gas Partnership

From E&E News:

A major 2007 report by the National Petroleum Council - an advisory body to DOE - also touted the potential of the technique as a way to help slow declines in U.S. oil production and address climate change. The report called for streamlining regulations and expedited permitting of enhanced recovery projects, pipelines and related infrastructure.

The report notes that the oil industry is already using naturally occuring CO2 for enhanced recovery projects without trying to store the CO2 underground permanently. The technology could be modified with “relative ease” to emphasize storage, the report said, adding that industrial sources of CO2 can also be used.

Enhanced oil recovery would likely only provide a small fraction of the capacity needed for CO2 sequestration, “it does offer a strong technology bridge to carbon sequestration technologies and should be encouraged as an important element of a CCS [carbon capture and storage] strategy,” the report noted.

But not everyone sees using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery as a promising way to help fight global warming. Joseph Romm, a climate expert with the liberal Center for American Progress, says it is a bad idea because the gains of storing the carbon are negated through the refining and burning of the recovered oil.

From E&E News:

For the Interior and Environment bill, the subcommittee will likely make up for what it considers to be major shortfalls in the president’s proposed budget for basic programs for the sake of administration pet projects.

The Bush administration’s $10.7 billion fiscal 2009 budget proposal for the Interior Department represents a slight decrease from last year’s budget and shifts funding from some standard functions like construction and range improvement for specific department initiatives such as the National Park Service’s Centennial Challenge.

Subcommittee Chairman Norm Dicks (D-Wash.) has said his priorities are to increase funding for wildlife refuges and national parks. He plans to increase allocation levels for wildlife refuges, even beyond the boost he gave refuges last year.

Congress gave a $39 million boost to refuges last year, in light of a funding crisis that threatened to downscale refuge programs and lay off staff. Dicks’ spending panel had proposed even more, but the number was lowered in negotiations with the Senate.

Wildfire funding could also see a major boost following months of criticism from Dicks and other members of the subcommittee over what they believe is a lopsided budget for addressing wildfires.

Forest Service fire suppression efforts would get a $148 million increase – to just under $1 billion – under the plan, a total based on the 10-year average of fire suppression costs.

The suppression figure is unlikely to change, but Dicks and others on the committee have slammed other aspects of the Forest Service proposal, claiming it puts too much emphasis on suppression and not enough on preventive measures like fuels reduction. The Bush administration budget proposal would provide $297 million for projects to reduce hazardous fuels, down from $310 million in fiscal 2008.

The subcommittee may also consider an effort by Rep. John Peterson (R-Pa.) to open up part of the outer continental shelf to oil and gas drilling.

The House Natural Resources Committee, led by Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV), will meet in open markup session to mark up the following bills:

• H.R. 3981 (B. Miller): To authorize the Preserve America Program and Save America’s Treasures Program, and for other purposes. “Preserve America and Save America’s Treasures Act”
• H.R. 5451 (Bordallo): To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other purposes. “Coastal Zone Reauthorization Act of 2008”
• H.R. 4199 (Turner): To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to add sites to the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes.
• H.R. 2964 (E.B. Johnson): To amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to treat nonhuman primates as prohibited wildlife species under that Act, to make corrections in the provisions relating to captive wildlife offenses under that Act, and for other purposes. “Captive Primate Safety Act”
• H.R. 5741 (Bordallo): To amend the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to improve the conservation of sharks. “Shark Conservation Act of 2008”
• H.R. 1423 (Visclosky): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease a portion of a visitor center to be constructed outside the boundary of the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore in Porter County, Indiana, and for other purposes. “Dorothy Buell Memorial Visitor Center Lease Act”
• H.R. 3702 (Rehberg): To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, Montana, to Jefferson County, Montana, for use as a cemetery. “Montana Cemetery Act of 2007”
• H.R. 5710 (T. Udall): To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide financial assistance to the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water Authority for the planning, design, and construction of the Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System, and for other purposes. “Eastern New Mexico Rural Water System Authorization Act”
• H.R. 5511 (Lamborn): To direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, to remedy problems caused by a collapsed drainage tunnel in Leadville, Colorado, and for other purposes. “Leadville Mine Drainage Tunnel Remediation Act of 2008”

Witnesses

• Dr. Robert J. Wooley, Director, Process Engineering, Abengoa Bioenergy New Technology
• Scott Barnwell, General Manager, Blue Ridge Biofuels
• Tom Todaro, CEO, Targeted Growth and Sustainable Oils
• Jeffrey M. Trucksess, Executive Vice President, Green Earth Fuels, LLC
• Robert Byrnes, Nebraska Renewable Energy Systems

The bill provides incentives to lenders and financial institutions to provide lower interest loans and other benefits to consumers, who build, buy or remodel their homes and businesses to improve their energy efficiency. This timely legislation reflects the input of a broad coalition of housing advocates, financial institutions, government leaders, developers, and the environmental community.

Witnesses

Panel One

• Michael Freedberg, Director, Division of Affordable Housing Technology Research; Co-Chair, HUD Energy Task Force, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
• Patrick J. Lawler, Chief Economist and Associate Director, Office of Policy Analysis and Research, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight

Panel Two

• Doris Koo, President and Chief Executive Officer, Enterprises Community Partners, Inc.
• Marshall E. Purnell, FAIA, President, American Institute of Architects
• Jerry Howard, President, National Association of Homebuilders
• Tom Hicks, Vice President, International Programs and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design for Neighborhood Development, U.S. Green Building Council
• Alan W. George, Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officers, Equity Residential
• Scott Bernstein, President, Center for Neighborhood Technology